Sunday, March 18, 2012

Reflection #2 - "Final" Reflection!

Completing a final reflection is always a somewhat anti-climactic event.  I feel like I am supposed to synthesize all my knowledge and thoughts about a certain course or topic in a couple of paragraphs, but usually fail to put what I’ve actually learned (or how I’ve changed) into my sub-par style of writing.  But I’ll try – here we go.

This course has been difficult and frustrating at times, but has helped me develop a new view of technology and how it can best be utilized in the educational setting.  If I’m going to be completely honest, I had a negative attitude towards technology, specifically towards using technology in the classroom, before this class.  I think that this attitude came from watching teachers use technology as a way to keep students “busy” in class rather than “engaged.”  Many teachers I know assign students projects like “complete a web quest”, “make a PowerPoint about…”, “create a website”, etc., etc. to fill up time during the class period so that the teacher could grade papers or plan a sports practice or catch up on e-mail.  I don’t agree with this practice and think that this is a disservice to students.

About halfway through this course I realized that I developed a negative attitude towards technology when it wasn’t the technology’s fault – it was the teachers fault.  Those teachers knew that they could carve out time for themselves if the students were “busy” working on a project during class time.

After further reflecting upon what I have learned in this course, I realize that it’s definitely not the technology’s fault, and maybe not even the teacher’s fault.  It could be that the teacher never received necessary professional development in order to effectively utilize technology in their classroom.  I certainly know that I never received professional development on how to utilize technology into my classroom.  Many of the technologies that I’ve learned in this course (Diigo, VoiceThread, Livebinder, blogging, wikis, etc.) are difficult to use the first time.  I have spent a lot of time in the last three months trying to figure out how to use these technologies.  The first time I used any of them it took a long time and was frustrating.  In fact, it became so frustrating and time-consuming that I would put the assignments off until the last minute just so I didn’t have to become frustrated.  It was party a good thing that I did this though, because I had no choice but to push on through the frustration and learn the technology (otherwise I may have stopped halfway through).  Here’s the thing, though, the second time that I utilized these technologies they were super easy to use.  I did not become frustrated.  I did things quickly and efficiently.  Perhaps we all just have to get through the frustration of the first time in order to utilize these things effectively.  Perhaps other people are just like me and will put off learning technology because it can be frustrating and time consuming.  Perhaps it is the job of school administrators to provide teachers with professional development opportunities and time to learn how to implement good technology into their classrooms.  Perhaps.  These are thoughts that I will both not forget tomorrow and work on applying to my job as an administrator.

Since learning how to use these technologies I have become a more effective communicator and a more organized person.  Who knew – my wife has been asking me to become more organized for years.  After experiencing this, I realize that teachers (and students) deserve professional development and training in current technologies so that they can correctly implement them in their classroom.  Perhaps this means that my initial frustration towards teachers should have been directed towards the administration for not providing enough professional development opportunities.  Now that I am an administrator and this is part of my job, it is necessary that I provide this opportunity for teachers.

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Blog #4 - Should We Slow Down?

Blogger Steven Anderson recently wrote some of the same thoughts that I have been thinking.  Steven's original post can be found here: http://bit.ly/wPjumr


I’ve been treading water to try and get through “Educational Technology Boot Camp” and have immersed myself in learning how to use myriads of “apps” and Web 2.0 technologies.  As I near the end of the course, I’m trying to take a minute to step back and reflect on what I’ve learned, how I can apply my knowledge to increase student achievement, and whether or not this technology is necessary. 

In his March 4th, 2012 blog entry, Steven comments:

“Technology exclusively can't change learning. You can't put 30 iPads (or Chromebooks, laptops, IWB, or whatever type of technology you can think of) in a classroom and in an instant learning gets better. It just does not happen that way. It takes a lot of stepping back, looking at the why's and the how's and deciding on the direction to go. And even before devices hit the hands of kids, there has to be lots and lots and lots of PD on how access to these tools in the classroom changes the way we teach.

Lets just slow down, and think, is buying this the best decision for me? Or for my students?”

Although this is only a short excerpt from his post, many of his comments struck a nerve with me.  He begins with “technology exclusively can’t change learning.”  I agree.  Technology is a tool that teachers can use to enhance the learning environment.  The technology itself will not teach students, it will help them learn but it won’t plan lessons and grade papers and give feedback (at least not yet).

Teachers must know how to use the technology in order to use it effectively.  This brings me to the next comment that Steven made: “even before the devices hit the hands of kids, there has to be lots and lots and lots of PD on how to access to these tools in the classroom changes the way we teach.”  It seems like many districts are spending thousands of dollars purchasing tablets and iPads and other devices to implement pilot programs in classrooms. They are doing this without the professional development and technology infrastructure in place to support these initiatives. 

Should we slow down after all?  Or should we acquire the technology and drive forward?  What do you think?